Five Questions about Ethics in Political Communication - Mike Nellis

Mike Nellis headshot.jpg

Mike Nellis is the CEO and Founder of Authentic, an award-winning agency focused on running ethical digital fundraising and advertising programs for political campaigns. He has 16 years experience working in politics and a background in strategic communication, business, and marketing. @mikenellis

1) To what ethical standard should political communication be held? Where should political communication ethics be grounded?

I believe political practitioners like myself have a responsibility to treat our supporters and the American public with respect and dignity. Most of my career in politics has been focused on online fundraising where we have the ability to empower people to engage in our political process. That’s a good thing! But on both sides of the aisle, too many campaigns and consultants are using scare tactics to scam people out of their hard-earned money, which destroys trust in our political system.

We have to realize that what we say, how we say it, and what we do matters to people — especially when we’re asking them to make contributions to our campaign. The money we’re collecting from ordinary Americans is money that helps them put food on the table or take care of a loved one. We have a responsibility to make sure we’re building a meaningful connection between the campaigns and causes we’re working on and the people who trust us to help them engage in our system. 

2) Why should someone in political communication behave ethically?

Maybe I’m naïve, but treating people with respect and dignity is just the right thing to do. It’s also one of the best ways to fix our broken political system. The truth is, politicians like Donald Trump have worked really hard to divide us in order to gain power, money, and influence. They’ve done it by lying, cheating, stealing, and preying on our anxieties as human-beings. 

There are real differences in the direction Americans want to take our country, but I really do believe there’s more that unites us than divides us as a people. If political campaigns were operated more ethically and honestly, I think it would be a lot easier to bring people together to get things done on the issues that matter. 

3) Can you give an example of ethical political communication? What can people point to and say “do more of that?”

There were so many great digital programs in the last election that tried to do this the right way. We ran the digital fundraising for John Hickenlooper and raised tens of millions of dollars online without ever scamming people of their money. In fact, almost every top-performing piece of content for us was rooted in John’s authentic voice and brand. It wasn’t all doom-and-gloom and all that. It was a really thoughtful program from the candidate on down. John would frequently look for little fun opportunities to show off this personality like shooting Facebook videos to supporters of him playing the banjo to ask for donations. It worked so well. We really proved in 2020 that you don’t have to scam people to raise money online. 

4) Can you give an example of an ethical challenge or question you or political communication professionals in your field have faced or are likely to face?

Anybody working in digital politics is going to face campaign stakeholders pushing you to max out your fundraising numbers or get as much engagement as possible. It creates a race to the bottom for content and it often makes us forget about the basic dignity of the people reading our content. You have to be ready to push back and advocate for a better program. In the short-term it can be hard to convince people to do this in a better way, but so many campaigns — like Hickenlooper above or the Biden campaign last year — have proven you can run programs deeply rooted in content that is more uplifting and personal. 

5) Can you give an example of an ethical challenge or question you or political communication professionals in your field have faced or are likely to face?

More than anything, figure out what you stand for and plant yourself as best you can. Politics can be such a zero-sum game. In fact, many people who work in this industry treat it like a role-playing game where the consequences barely matter to them. But if you know what you’re about and what you want to accomplish, especially as it pertains to your ethical framework, you can work backwards and make decisions that reflect what you want to happen. It takes time to develop. I have a very different view of myself and this industry and my work than I did 15 years ago. I’m sure that’ll be true in 15 years too. Keep at it. We need people who care about doing this the right way because we can’t leave the politics to the scammers and hacks.

Spring Update

Project on Ethics in Political Communication

Spring Update
May, 2021

In March, the Project on Ethics in Political Communication celebrated turning two by hosting a conversation about ethics and political consulting with the president of the American Association of Political Consultants, a member of the AAPC ethics committee, and a George Washington University student majoring in political communication and minoring in applied ethics. Who says ethicists don’t know how to party?

We haven’t been resting on our young laurels. Between mid-March and the end of April we:

Co-sponsored a discussion about the theory and practice of civil religion in American politics with the Center for the Study of Religion and Conflict at Arizona State University.

Capture 3.JPG

Talked to leaders at New Politics about navigating the ethical challenges political campaigns face. New Politics recruits, trains and supports candidates who have served in the military or national service organizations such as the PeaceCorps and AmericCorps.

Capture 4.JPG

Participated in a panel discussion on political communication ethics sponsored by the Rock Ethics Institute at Penn State.

Capture 5.JPG

Talked to students at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard about the often unseen ethical challenges faced by advocacy campaigns.

Capture 6.JPG

Media

Reporters continue to reach out to the Project for comment on political events.

Capture 8.JPG

Textbook

Political Communication Ethics: Theory and Practice is available now - a perfect supplement for courses in advocacy, political communication and strategic communication.

What’s Next

This summer the Project is working on more case studies with the Media Ethics Initiative at UT Austin, more events, more media outreach, more talks, and more writing. Have an idea, want to schedule a talk or write for our blog? Let us know.

Keep in Touch

You can keep with all the goings-on on TwitterFacebook and LinkedIn. Tell your friends.

Thank you as always for your support,

Peter


Peter Loge
Director
ploge@gwu.edu

Can the Soul of the Nation Be Saved?

The Project on Ethics in Political Communication and the Center for the Study of Religion and Conflict at Arizona State University hosted a discussion about politics, civil religion and the “soul of the nation.” The panelists were Project director Peter Loge, Center interim director John Carlson, director of the Black Church Studies Program and associate professor in the practice of sociology of religion and culture at the Candler School of Theology at Emory University Nichole Phillips, and Truman -Albright Fellow and US Senate staffer Andre Gonzales. The discussion was moderated by Type Media Center fellow Rozina Ali.

You can watch the discussion here.

Case study: The Ethics of Using Psychographic Data in Political Campaigns

Classroom ready case study with the Center for Media Ethics at UT - Austin

“In a world of big data, the information that consumers regularly and voluntarily generate is completely changing the landscape of political communication. At every step of the process, political communicators must consider how far they are willing to go to change a voter’s mind. At what point does a political advertisement blatantly manipulate a voter’s information? Has this information been obtained with the voter’s consent? Is the use of psychographic information capitalizing on a culture of misinformation, sensationalism, and alarmism in a way that harms voters?”

Read this full case study and others here.

Can the Soul of the Nation Be Saved?

Capture.JPG

Can appeals to civil religion win elections and unite America?

The Project on Ethics in Political Communication at The George Washington University and the Center for the Study of Religion and Conflict at Arizona State University are bringing together leading scholars and practitioners for a conversation about what the “soul of the nation” means in theory – and in practice.

President Biden promised to restore the soul of America, an idea he repeated during his inaugural address. For some this appeal to “civil religion” can bring the nation together with a shared moral purpose. For others, it can be exclusionary and raises concerns about “Christian nationalism” and fears about national hubris.

“The idea of a national soul, or of a civil religion, is a staple of American politics.” said Peter Loge, the director of the Project on Ethics in Political Communication at the George Washington University and a political veteran. “But what candidates mean by it, and whether or not it’s more than a talking point, are open questions.”

“This discussion aims to bring theory and practice together,” said John Carlson, the interim director of the Center for the Study of Religion and Conflict at Arizona State University. “The idea of a shared civic faith can look very different in academia than it does in the halls of Congress or in our communities. We hope our discussion finds ways to bridge these divides.”

 The event will take place over Zoom on April 1 at 3:00pm MST/6:00pm EST. It is free and open to the public. The panel is:

  • John Carlson, interim director of the Center for the Study of Religion and Conflict, associate professor in the School of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies at Arizona State University, and co-director of the Recovering Truth project.

  • André Gonzales is a staff assistant in the United States Senate, a 2019 Truman Scholar and a current Truman-Albright Fellow with the Harry S. Truman Foundation.

  • Peter Loge, director of the Project on Ethics in Political Communication and an associate professor at The George Washington University.

  • Nichole R. Phillips, director of the Black Church Studies Program and associate professor in the practice of sociology of religion and culture at the Candler School of Theology at Emory University a senior faculty fellow at the Emory Center for Ethics. 

The moderator is Rozina Ali, a fellow at Type Media Center. Her reporting and essays have appeared in The New YorkerForeign AffairsThe Nation, the GuardianNew York Times, Al Jazeera America, Foreign Policy, and others.

Details and registration are here: https://csrc.asu.edu/content/can-soul-nation-be-saved

Happy Birthday to Us

Capture.JPG

The Project on Ethics in Political Communication just turned two.

We launched the Project on Ethics in Political Communication two years ago to promote the study, teaching, and practice of political communication ethics. Fittingly, American political discourse has a case of the terrible twos.

All in all, we feel like we’re off to a good start. Below are some of the highlights from our first 24 months.

So far we have…

  • Written for Campaigns & Elections, The Hill, The Fulcrum, Current Commentary and Media Ethics.

  • Been interviewed on radio and podcasts, and by television and print journalists around the country.

  • Hosted discussions in person (remember those?), on video, and via text with a candidates, practitioners, academics, students, journalists, and pundits.

  • Led two dozen conversations on campuses and at conferences, companies, coalitions, and a congregation.

  • Worked with the Media Ethics Initiative at UT - Austin on half a dozen classroom-ready case studies (so far). These real examples of ethical challenges faced by candidates and advocates help students see how the theory of ethics is, and is not, applied in the real world.

  • Promoted Political Communication Ethics: Theory and Practice, the first textbook on political communication ethics to bring together chapters by both academics and practitioners.

These first two years are just the start.

In the coming weeks we are co-sponsoring an event with the Center for the Study of Religion and Conflict at Arizona State University, and speaking at Harvard’s Kennedy School and elsewhere. An event on digital ethics and the public square and more are in the works. You can keep with all the goings-on on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn.

We are always making more connections, finding new opportunities, and talking to anyone who will listen. Have an idea, want to schedule a talk or write for our blog? Let us know.

March 4 - How Can We Make Political Campaigns More Ethical?

Capture.JPG

Join the Project on Ethics in Political Communication for a conversation about how we can make political campaigns more ethical on Thursday, March 4 from 6:00 - 7:00pm EST with:

Register here - We will send a Zoom link to registrants on March 4.

Do you have an idea or question for the panel? Let us know.